Why the Apathy In Local Elections?
Does The Word Money Come To Mind?
by Donald J. Cook
Have you ever given any thought as to why a good majority of our citizens
choose to distance themselves from local election activities throughout the
Silver State? Why do highly qualified and talented individuals opt not to
seek public office? Why are voter turnout figures for these elections
mediocre at best?
At the risk of sounding somewhat cynical, electing our local governmental
officials is something akin to looking for a used car. With optimistic hope
one goes “shopping” and encounters possible hopefuls with the all too
familiar sights and smells associated with the hasty refurbishing needed to
conceal basic flaws. One is given a myriad of veiled promises with no
guarantee. Let the buyer beware! After a couple of election cycles, we are
then the proud owners of a fleet that most would not take for a leisurely
Sunday outing, let alone be used to drive the various economic engines
within the community.
We as a society have lost trust in the “system”. Democracy,
one-man-one-vote and equal representation all take a distant rear seat in
antiquity to Special Interest involvement. As with the proverbial used car,
the single most important factor is the financial Bottom Line. Why in the
world would any sane person with pure motives want to participate as a
candidate in such a process?
As reported in other segments of the Nevada Observer, candidate Campaign
Contribution and Expenditure Reports provide incredible insight into the
motives and future actions of the candidate and ultimately, your public
servant. The poet who described the “eyes as being the window to one’s soul”
obviously had never feasted his baby blues on any of the current C&E’s on
file! Not just a window, but also, a complete roadmap to the heart of the
process.
Let’s do the math! Why would a candidate for public office “loan their
campaign” more money than they would receive in one or two years, or even
the full term of that office? A nice loophole; forget about asking where the
money may have come from in the first place! Don’t worry about the statutory
$10K per person/entity contribution. A not too creative Special Interest
knows to have the spouse, every child, each corporate officer, manager, et
al participate with a handsome contribution to THEIR candidate for office.
It is all about the money! Nothing less, nothing more! Philosophically, such
transactions are to “provide access” to the public official. What
businessman or Special Interest would pay that kind of money to merely “go
to the front of the line”? Let’s get real!
In closer races where the potential “heir apparent” does not immediately
surface, one will find these folks “hedging their bets” by giving a modest
$1K-$5K contribution to EACH candidate to office until the final lap of the
race! Once the winner is known, then the subsequent contributions start to
pile up, thereby “retiring the debt” (and then some) of the candidate. The
candidate, now Elected Official, can use any and all of those funds in the
“course of their duties.” As noted in previous stories within the Nevada
Observer, the criteria are quite liberal.
Located somewhere in the mix is the candidate who is a very active and
popular person within their Ward or District and they want to make a
difference within the community. They may have large grassroots support, but
if they fail to align with the Special Interest “design manual,” how far do
you think your and your neighbor’s $50 contribution will take them?
So, it is all about the money. What can we do? We as the public must
demand that our legislators enact campaign reform to cap the amount of
monies that a candidate can receive. It is called leveling the playing
field. Imagine a candidate having to actually focus on issues instead of
money! A public official looking out for the public’s best interests; is it
possible? We can only hope and try our best!
A New Feature Comes To Your Nevada
Observer Pages
The Nevada Observer is by, for, and about Nevadans. We still have some
archival space on our website, so we are going to use it to present to our
readers a series of relatively scarce Nevada history texts which are now in
the public domain. We propose to put the text up for one month (two issues)
of The Nevada Observer, and then replace it with a new story, book, or
document. For those interested in this sort of reading, make a special point
to take a look at our upcoming issues.
SCHEDULE
June 1 and 15: "A Peep At Washoe" by renowned writer J. Ross Browne
July 1 and 15: "Sazerac Lying Club" by Fred H. Hart. You'll rip your
knickers reading this
August 1 and 15: "As I Remember Them" by C.C. Goodwin
September 1 and 15: "Brigham's Destroying Angel" by William Hickman
October 1 and 15: "Reminiscences" written by Nevada's first U.S. Senator,
William Stewart, also known as the father of mining law in the country.
November 1 and 15: "Lassen County" by Asa Merrill Fairfield. Some still
think Susanville south should be Nevada.
December 1 and 15: Writings from Lewis Adelbert Norton
A group dedicated to historic preservation recently named 11 sites around
the state that are in danger of being lost, including the oldest commercial
building still standing in Reno, the Reno Masonic Temple/Reno Mercantile
Building, and the LaConcha Hotel Lobby in Las Vegas. In between is the
railroad in Ely, Jack's Saloon building in Carson City (just how many laws
have been written at that long oaken plank?), and the Applegate-Lassen
trail.
These buildings and sites are still standing. Over the next few weeks,
we're going to show you some of the buildings and sites around the state
that we've lost. There are many that scream, "We can't continue to trash our
history."

Those old-timers from Reno will remember this unique little club. It was
torn down and replaced with a concrete patio for Harrah's Reno.
|